Leaderboards

House members, by what their purchases did over one month

KM

Kelly Morrisonthin

Dem · MN · 5 decisions

Return+13.2%S&P +6.5%

+6.7

points vs S&P

DE

Dwight Evans

Dem · PA · 6 decisions

Return+16.8%S&P +12.9%

+3.9

points vs S&P

BD

Byron Donalds

Rep · FL · 37 decisions

Return+7.8%S&P +4.3%

+3.5

points vs S&P

All 37 · sorted by vs S&PSwipe to see all columns →

#	Member	Party	State	Decisions	Companies	Return	S&P, same days	vs S&P	Up
1	KMKelly Morrisonthin After selling +0.7 vs S&P, 20 sales	Dem	MN	5	3	+13.2%	+6.5%	+6.7	100%
2	DEDwight Evans After selling −3.0 vs S&P, 24 sales	Dem	PA	6	5	+16.8%	+12.9%	+3.9	100%
3	BDByron Donalds After selling +5.4 vs S&P, 40 sales	Rep	FL	37	28	+7.8%	+4.3%	+3.5	65%
4	TWTim Walberg After selling −9.4 vs S&P, 2 sales	Rep	MI	13	13	+2.2%	−1.0%	+3.2	46%
5	MRMichael A. Rulli After selling −0.4 vs S&P, 14 sales	Rep	OH	11	11	+1.4%	−1.4%	+2.8	55%
6	RLRick Larsen After selling +5.8 vs S&P, 18 sales	Dem	WA	17	17	+5.5%	+2.8%	+2.7	88%
7	CFCleo Fields After selling +1.2 vs S&P, 11 sales	Dem	LA	94	31	+3.8%	+1.2%	+2.6	59%
8	MSMaria Elvira Salazar After selling +1.7 vs S&P, 6 sales	Rep	FL	34	30	+4.4%	+2.2%	+2.2	56%
9	TMTim Moore After selling −3.7 vs S&P, 43 sales	Rep	NC	61	23	+4.3%	+2.3%	+2.0	54%
10	RARick W. Allen After selling +1.2 vs S&P, 17 sales	Rep	GA	14	13	+2.5%	+0.8%	+1.7	57%
11	NPNancy Pelosi After selling +1.8 vs S&P, 9 sales	Dem	CA	7	6	+2.3%	+0.7%	+1.6	57%
12	WKWilliam R. Keating After selling −8.1 vs S&P, 3 sales	Dem	MA	8	8	−0.8%	−2.4%	+1.6	38%
13	VFVirginia Foxx After selling +1.5 vs S&P, 17 sales	Rep	NC	21	11	+3.4%	+2.2%	+1.2	76%
14	JJJulie Johnson After selling −0.5 vs S&P, 434 sales	Dem	TX	103	86	−0.6%	−1.7%	+1.1	41%
15	JMJared Moskowitz After selling −2.1 vs S&P, 28 sales	Dem	FL	64	49	+3.7%	+2.8%	+0.9	61%
16	RMRichard McCormick After selling +2.3 vs S&P, 39 sales	Rep	GA	59	27	+2.6%	+1.8%	+0.8	66%
17	DNDan Newhouse After selling +0.3 vs S&P, 75 sales	Rep	WA	36	36	+1.7%	+1.1%	+0.6	53%
18	DTDavid J. Taylor After selling −0.3 vs S&P, 66 sales	Rep	OH	100	29	+2.2%	+1.7%	+0.5	64%
19	MGMarjorie Taylor Greene After selling +10.7 vs S&P, 1 sale	Left the House		225	78	+3.0%	+2.6%	+0.4	64%
20	VHVal T. Hoyle After selling +1.1 vs S&P, 188 sales	Dem	OR	158	157	+1.0%	+0.6%	+0.4	49%
21	JJJonathan L. Jackson After selling +0.6 vs S&P, 46 sales	Dem	IL	42	32	+1.8%	+1.5%	+0.3	57%
22	JGJosh Gottheimer After selling +0.3 vs S&P, 305 sales	Dem	NJ	135	94	−0.6%	−0.9%	+0.3	48%
23	GCGilbert Ray Cisneros, Jr. After selling 0.0 vs S&P, 477 sales	Dem	CA	745	358	+2.0%	+1.8%	+0.2	54%
24	TKThomas H. Kean, Jr. After selling +2.3 vs S&P, 52 sales	Rep	NJ	51	28	+1.6%	+1.4%	+0.2	55%
25	JSJefferson Shreve After selling −0.6 vs S&P, 349 sales	Rep	IN	185	149	+3.9%	+4.0%	−0.1	68%
26	JLJulia Letlow After selling +1.0 vs S&P, 72 sales	Rep	LA	115	106	−0.7%	−0.4%	−0.3	53%
27	RBRobert P. Bresnahan, Jr. After selling 0.0 vs S&P, 315 sales	Rep	PA	214	166	+3.0%	+3.4%	−0.4	64%
28	LMLisa C. McClain After selling +0.3 vs S&P, 507 sales	Rep	MI	624	422	+1.6%	+2.2%	−0.6	56%
29	JCJames Comer After selling +4.3 vs S&P, 12 sales	Rep	KY	24	24	+2.2%	+2.9%	−0.7	67%
30	BWBruce Westerman After selling −0.7 vs S&P, 104 sales	Rep	AR	97	95	+10.9%	+12.4%	−1.5	89%
31	ADApril McClain Delaney After selling +0.1 vs S&P, 101 sales	Dem	MD	100	34	+0.3%	+1.9%	−1.6	55%
32	LDLloyd Doggett	Dem	TX	34	6	+2.9%	+4.6%	−1.7	62%
33	SFScott Franklin After selling −0.4 vs S&P, 26 sales	Rep	FL	33	30	−1.2%	+1.0%	−2.2	42%
34	RTRitchie Torres After selling +1.8 vs S&P, 59 sales	Dem	NY	61	61	+2.8%	+5.2%	−2.4	59%
35	APAugust Pfluger After selling +2.6 vs S&P, 6 sales	Rep	TX	6	6	+2.3%	+5.3%	−3.0	67%
36	JMJohn J. McGuire III After selling −0.3 vs S&P, 7 sales	Rep	VA	12	9	−2.4%	+0.6%	−3.0	17%
37	CMCarol D. Miller After selling +1.0 vs S&P, 9 sales	Rep	WV	9	9	−3.3%	+9.0%	−12.3	33%

Returns are per decision, equal weight, measured from the day the report became public. A record at the minimum (5 decisions, 3 companies) is marked thin.

Tap a column to sort by it. "Decisions" counts the separate calls that are old enough to have a one month number, and "Companies" how many different companies they cover. A member joins this table on 5 decisions across 3 companies, so a run of buys in one share is not a record.

Every decision counts once and counts the same, because a Congress report gives ranges, not amounts. One company in one report is one decision, however many lines it was filed on. Measured from the close of the first trading day after the filing date, because a report can be posted a day after the date it carries and the hour is never given, so this is what a reader could have done, not what the member did.

Ranked by what the trades did beyond the S&P 500 over the same days, so a record that only rode a rising market does not sit at the top. The plain return is in the next column. Pick a window above the table: one month, three months or six months. Each window ranks the people whose decisions are old enough to have a number for it, so the one month board has more names than the six month board.

The small line under a name is that person's sales over the same window: what the stock did after each sale against the S&P, sign flipped, so a positive number means the stock fell behind the market after the sale. Sales never move the ranking.

House members, by what their purchases did over three months

KM

Kelly Morrisonthin

Dem · MN · 5 decisions

Return+30.6%S&P +15.3%

+15.3

points vs S&P

DE

Dwight Evans

Dem · PA · 6 decisions

Return+29.8%S&P +18.3%

+11.5

points vs S&P

CF

Cleo Fields

Dem · LA · 89 decisions

Return+16.6%S&P +5.2%

+11.4

points vs S&P

All 36 · sorted by vs S&PSwipe to see all columns →

#	Member	Party	State	Decisions	Companies	Return	S&P, same days	vs S&P	Up
1	KMKelly Morrisonthin After selling +1.7 vs S&P, 20 sales	Dem	MN	5	3	+30.6%	+15.3%	+15.3	100%
2	DEDwight Evans After selling −1.3 vs S&P, 22 sales	Dem	PA	6	5	+29.8%	+18.3%	+11.5	83%
3	CFCleo Fields After selling −6.8 vs S&P, 11 sales	Dem	LA	89	30	+16.6%	+5.2%	+11.4	69%
4	TMTim Moore After selling −6.2 vs S&P, 41 sales	Rep	NC	61	23	+11.3%	+6.0%	+5.3	72%
5	MSMaria Elvira Salazar After selling −2.4 vs S&P, 3 sales	Rep	FL	29	28	+7.7%	+4.1%	+3.6	66%
6	JGJosh Gottheimer After selling +1.0 vs S&P, 293 sales	Dem	NJ	128	90	+7.8%	+4.4%	+3.4	66%
7	NPNancy Pelosi After selling +3.0 vs S&P, 9 sales	Dem	CA	7	6	+3.0%	−0.4%	+3.4	71%
8	JJJulie Johnson After selling 0.0 vs S&P, 398 sales	Dem	TX	66	53	+7.5%	+4.2%	+3.3	71%
9	BDByron Donalds After selling +7.9 vs S&P, 38 sales	Rep	FL	36	27	+12.5%	+9.3%	+3.2	58%
10	RLRick Larsen After selling −1.9 vs S&P, 16 sales	Dem	WA	15	15	+4.2%	+1.0%	+3.2	73%
11	RMRichard McCormick After selling +6.8 vs S&P, 10 sales	Rep	GA	55	27	+2.8%	+0.5%	+2.3	51%
12	JMJared Moskowitz After selling −1.4 vs S&P, 27 sales	Dem	FL	57	45	+8.7%	+7.0%	+1.7	70%
13	VFVirginia Foxx After selling +6.0 vs S&P, 16 sales	Rep	NC	21	11	+4.1%	+2.8%	+1.3	67%
14	MGMarjorie Taylor Greene After selling +35.2 vs S&P, 1 sale	Left the House		225	78	+8.8%	+7.8%	+1.0	66%
15	WKWilliam R. Keating After selling +0.8 vs S&P, 3 sales	Dem	MA	8	8	−2.4%	−3.3%	+0.9	50%
16	TKThomas H. Kean, Jr. After selling +5.7 vs S&P, 41 sales	Rep	NJ	43	24	+5.4%	+4.9%	+0.5	63%
17	TWTim Walberg After selling +2.3 vs S&P, 2 sales	Rep	MI	13	13	+2.5%	+2.4%	+0.1	62%
18	APAugust Pfluger After selling +11.7 vs S&P, 6 sales	Rep	TX	6	6	+6.2%	+6.2%	0.0	67%
19	DTDavid J. Taylor After selling +3.3 vs S&P, 63 sales	Rep	OH	91	28	+6.7%	+7.2%	−0.5	58%
20	GCGilbert Ray Cisneros, Jr. After selling +1.6 vs S&P, 453 sales	Dem	CA	704	349	+4.7%	+5.2%	−0.5	53%
21	LMLisa C. McClain After selling −0.4 vs S&P, 507 sales	Rep	MI	624	422	+4.6%	+5.1%	−0.5	55%
22	LDLloyd Doggett	Dem	TX	29	6	+5.8%	+6.8%	−1.0	62%
23	VHVal T. Hoyle After selling −1.4 vs S&P, 188 sales	Dem	OR	158	157	+2.4%	+3.4%	−1.0	54%
24	DNDan Newhouse After selling +3.9 vs S&P, 57 sales	Rep	WA	24	24	+1.1%	+2.2%	−1.1	54%
25	JSJefferson Shreve After selling +1.8 vs S&P, 349 sales	Rep	IN	185	149	+11.1%	+12.7%	−1.6	69%
26	RARick W. Allen After selling −3.8 vs S&P, 15 sales	Rep	GA	12	11	+2.5%	+4.2%	−1.7	42%
27	JMJohn J. McGuire III After selling −4.8 vs S&P, 4 sales	Rep	VA	10	7	+4.7%	+6.6%	−1.9	60%
28	JLJulia Letlow After selling +1.3 vs S&P, 72 sales	Rep	LA	115	106	+1.0%	+3.3%	−2.3	49%
29	RBRobert P. Bresnahan, Jr. After selling −3.1 vs S&P, 314 sales	Rep	PA	214	166	+8.5%	+11.1%	−2.6	65%
30	BWBruce Westerman After selling +1.1 vs S&P, 104 sales	Rep	AR	97	95	+16.2%	+19.2%	−3.0	90%
31	SFScott Franklin After selling +3.8 vs S&P, 26 sales	Rep	FL	33	30	+4.0%	+8.0%	−4.0	70%
32	JCJames Comer After selling +8.3 vs S&P, 12 sales	Rep	KY	24	24	−10.6%	−6.6%	−4.0	29%
33	JJJonathan L. Jackson After selling +0.1 vs S&P, 45 sales	Dem	IL	40	30	−0.8%	+4.6%	−5.4	45%
34	RTRitchie Torres After selling +3.8 vs S&P, 59 sales	Dem	NY	60	60	−1.0%	+4.5%	−5.5	45%
35	ADApril McClain Delaney After selling −0.7 vs S&P, 87 sales	Dem	MD	89	32	+1.2%	+6.9%	−5.7	51%
36	CMCarol D. Miller After selling +7.1 vs S&P, 5 sales	Rep	WV	9	9	+2.1%	+16.1%	−14.0	44%

Returns are per decision, equal weight, measured from the day the report became public. A record at the minimum (5 decisions, 3 companies) is marked thin.

Tap a column to sort by it. "Decisions" counts the separate calls that are old enough to have a three month number, and "Companies" how many different companies they cover. A member joins this table on 5 decisions across 3 companies, so a run of buys in one share is not a record.

Every decision counts once and counts the same, because a Congress report gives ranges, not amounts. One company in one report is one decision, however many lines it was filed on. Measured from the close of the first trading day after the filing date, because a report can be posted a day after the date it carries and the hour is never given, so this is what a reader could have done, not what the member did.

Ranked by what the trades did beyond the S&P 500 over the same days, so a record that only rode a rising market does not sit at the top. The plain return is in the next column. Pick a window above the table: one month, three months or six months. Each window ranks the people whose decisions are old enough to have a number for it, so the one month board has more names than the six month board.

The small line under a name is that person's sales over the same window: what the stock did after each sale against the S&P, sign flipped, so a positive number means the stock fell behind the market after the sale. Sales never move the ranking.

House members, by what their purchases did over six months

DE

Dwight Evans

Dem · PA · 6 decisions

Return+53.8%S&P +27.5%

+26.3

points vs S&P

KM

Kelly Morrisonthin

Dem · MN · 5 decisions

Return+34.0%S&P +22.9%

+11.1

points vs S&P

DN

Dan Newhouse

Rep · WA · 24 decisions

Return+9.2%S&P +3.0%

+6.2

points vs S&P

All 33 · sorted by vs S&PSwipe to see all columns →

#	Member	Party	State	Decisions	Companies	Return	S&P, same days	vs S&P	Up
1	DEDwight Evans After selling +6.4 vs S&P, 16 sales	Dem	PA	6	5	+53.8%	+27.5%	+26.3	100%
2	KMKelly Morrisonthin After selling +8.3 vs S&P, 20 sales	Dem	MN	5	3	+34.0%	+22.9%	+11.1	60%
3	DNDan Newhouse After selling +7.2 vs S&P, 57 sales	Rep	WA	24	24	+9.2%	+3.0%	+6.2	58%
4	JJJulie Johnson After selling +0.6 vs S&P, 394 sales	Dem	TX	65	52	+17.9%	+12.4%	+5.5	75%
5	JCJames Comer After selling +14.8 vs S&P, 12 sales	Rep	KY	24	24	+11.8%	+8.0%	+3.8	63%
6	LMLisa C. McClain After selling −2.1 vs S&P, 506 sales	Rep	MI	623	422	+10.9%	+7.6%	+3.3	62%
7	MGMarjorie Taylor Greene After selling +22.3 vs S&P, 1 sale	Left the House		225	78	+17.9%	+14.9%	+3.0	72%
8	CFCleo Fields After selling −11.1 vs S&P, 11 sales	Dem	LA	86	30	+10.7%	+8.3%	+2.4	58%
9	VHVal T. Hoyle After selling −0.6 vs S&P, 187 sales	Dem	OR	158	157	+3.7%	+2.2%	+1.5	49%
10	TMTim Moore After selling −8.9 vs S&P, 35 sales	Rep	NC	53	21	+12.3%	+11.3%	+1.0	72%
11	TKThomas H. Kean, Jr. After selling +8.9 vs S&P, 29 sales	Rep	NJ	38	23	+11.7%	+10.7%	+1.0	66%
12	RTRitchie Torres After selling −1.0 vs S&P, 59 sales	Dem	NY	60	60	+8.7%	+8.0%	+0.7	67%
13	JMJared Moskowitz After selling −2.8 vs S&P, 16 sales	Dem	FL	42	33	+15.5%	+15.3%	+0.2	64%
14	JGJosh Gottheimer After selling +2.5 vs S&P, 258 sales	Dem	NJ	109	77	+11.5%	+12.1%	−0.6	66%
15	RMRichard McCormick After selling +11.0 vs S&P, 4 sales	Rep	GA	49	27	+3.1%	+3.7%	−0.6	53%
16	NPNancy Pelosi After selling +1.5 vs S&P, 9 sales	Dem	CA	7	6	+6.8%	+7.5%	−0.7	71%
17	BDByron Donalds After selling +12.9 vs S&P, 35 sales	Rep	FL	32	24	+15.4%	+16.9%	−1.5	53%
18	JLJulia Letlow After selling −1.7 vs S&P, 72 sales	Rep	LA	115	106	+7.4%	+9.2%	−1.8	60%
19	JSJefferson Shreve After selling −0.6 vs S&P, 349 sales	Rep	IN	185	149	+17.3%	+19.5%	−2.2	61%
20	BWBruce Westerman After selling +0.1 vs S&P, 104 sales	Rep	AR	97	95	+23.8%	+26.3%	−2.5	85%
21	RLRick Larsen After selling +4.8 vs S&P, 11 sales	Dem	WA	11	11	+6.1%	+8.7%	−2.6	73%
22	GCGilbert Ray Cisneros, Jr. After selling +5.9 vs S&P, 342 sales	Dem	CA	540	287	+8.5%	+12.2%	−3.7	57%
23	DTDavid J. Taylor After selling −1.5 vs S&P, 55 sales	Rep	OH	77	28	+9.8%	+13.7%	−3.9	66%
24	SFScott Franklin After selling +3.3 vs S&P, 26 sales	Rep	FL	33	30	+7.1%	+12.0%	−4.9	61%
25	JJJonathan L. Jackson After selling −1.9 vs S&P, 39 sales	Dem	IL	38	28	+4.7%	+9.6%	−4.9	58%
26	WKWilliam R. Keating After selling +4.3 vs S&P, 3 sales	Dem	MA	8	8	+3.6%	+8.8%	−5.2	63%
27	RBRobert P. Bresnahan, Jr. After selling −10.3 vs S&P, 314 sales	Rep	PA	214	166	+12.3%	+18.1%	−5.8	65%
28	LDLloyd Doggett	Dem	TX	23	6	+9.8%	+15.6%	−5.8	65%
29	VFVirginia Foxx After selling +7.5 vs S&P, 16 sales	Rep	NC	20	11	+5.7%	+11.7%	−6.0	65%
30	RARick W. Allen After selling +4.9 vs S&P, 9 sales	Rep	GA	10	10	+2.3%	+10.2%	−7.9	50%
31	ADApril McClain Delaney After selling +3.5 vs S&P, 62 sales	Dem	MD	66	27	−0.2%	+13.4%	−13.6	50%
32	JMJohn J. McGuire III After selling +16.2 vs S&P, 3 sales	Rep	VA	6	6	−0.8%	+12.9%	−13.7	50%
33	CMCarol D. Miller After selling +16.2 vs S&P, 5 sales	Rep	WV	9	9	+6.0%	+23.5%	−17.5	89%

Returns are per decision, equal weight, measured from the day the report became public. A record at the minimum (5 decisions, 3 companies) is marked thin.

Tap a column to sort by it. "Decisions" counts the separate calls that are old enough to have a six month number, and "Companies" how many different companies they cover. A member joins this table on 5 decisions across 3 companies, so a run of buys in one share is not a record.

Every decision counts once and counts the same, because a Congress report gives ranges, not amounts. One company in one report is one decision, however many lines it was filed on. Measured from the close of the first trading day after the filing date, because a report can be posted a day after the date it carries and the hour is never given, so this is what a reader could have done, not what the member did.

Ranked by what the trades did beyond the S&P 500 over the same days, so a record that only rode a rising market does not sit at the top. The plain return is in the next column. Pick a window above the table: one month, three months or six months. Each window ranks the people whose decisions are old enough to have a number for it, so the one month board has more names than the six month board.

The small line under a name is that person's sales over the same window: what the stock did after each sale against the S&P, sign flipped, so a positive number means the stock fell behind the market after the sale. Sales never move the ranking.

Senators, by what their purchases did over one month

JF

John Fetterman

Dem · PA · 6 decisions

Return+21.0%S&P +8.8%

+12.2

points vs S&P

GP

Gary C. Peters

Dem · MI · 7 decisions

Return+6.2%S&P +0.9%

+5.3

points vs S&P

SC

Shelley Moore Capito

Rep · WV · 18 decisions

Return+6.5%S&P +3.7%

+2.8

points vs S&P

All 10 · sorted by vs S&PSwipe to see all columns →

#	Senator	Party	State	Decisions	Companies	Return	S&P, same days	vs S&P	Up
1	JFJohn Fetterman After selling +17.4 vs S&P, 1 sale	Dem	PA	6	5	+21.0%	+8.8%	+12.2	83%
2	GPGary C. Peters After selling −1.9 vs S&P, 3 sales	Dem	MI	7	7	+6.2%	+0.9%	+5.3	71%
3	SCShelley Moore Capito After selling +1.0 vs S&P, 63 sales	Rep	WV	18	11	+6.5%	+3.7%	+2.8	61%
4	AAAlan Armstrong After selling −3.1 vs S&P, 45 sales	Rep	OK	301	301	+3.9%	+2.0%	+1.9	63%
5	AKAngus S. King, Jr. After selling +1.1 vs S&P, 12 sales	Ind	ME	23	23	+4.8%	+3.1%	+1.7	65%
6	KBKatie Boyd Britt After selling +0.5 vs S&P, 7 sales	Rep	AL	12	12	+0.2%	−0.9%	+1.1	58%
7	JBJohn Boozman After selling +0.3 vs S&P, 160 sales	Rep	AR	175	86	+0.4%	−0.3%	+0.7	52%
8	JHJohn W. Hickenlooper After selling +3.8 vs S&P, 12 sales	Dem	CO	7	6	+2.0%	+1.4%	+0.6	57%
9	SWSheldon Whitehousethin After selling +1.3 vs S&P, 39 sales	Dem	RI	5	5	0.0%	+1.5%	−1.5	20%
10	TTTommy Tuberville After selling +0.7 vs S&P, 150 sales	Rep	AL	11	7	−4.4%	0.0%	−4.4	46%

Returns are per decision, equal weight, measured from the day the report became public. A record at the minimum (5 decisions, 3 companies) is marked thin.

Tap a column to sort by it. "Decisions" counts the separate calls that are old enough to have a one month number, and "Companies" how many different companies they cover. A senator joins this table on 5 decisions across 3 companies, so a run of buys in one share is not a record.

Every decision counts once and counts the same, because a Congress report gives ranges, not amounts. One company in one report is one decision, however many lines it was filed on. Measured from the close of the first trading day after the filing date, because a report can be posted a day after the date it carries and the hour is never given, so this is what a reader could have done, not what the member did.

Ranked by what the trades did beyond the S&P 500 over the same days, so a record that only rode a rising market does not sit at the top. The plain return is in the next column. Pick a window above the table: one month, three months or six months. Each window ranks the people whose decisions are old enough to have a number for it, so the one month board has more names than the six month board.

The small line under a name is that person's sales over the same window: what the stock did after each sale against the S&P, sign flipped, so a positive number means the stock fell behind the market after the sale. Sales never move the ranking.

Senators, by what their purchases did over three months

JF

John Fetterman

Dem · PA · 6 decisions

Return+37.7%S&P +12.9%

+24.8

points vs S&P

SC

Shelley Moore Capito

Rep · WV · 18 decisions

Return+18.1%S&P +7.6%

+10.5

points vs S&P

KB

Katie Boyd Britt

Rep · AL · 12 decisions

Return+7.7%S&P +2.6%

+5.1

points vs S&P

All 7 · sorted by vs S&PSwipe to see all columns →

#	Senator	Party	State	Decisions	Companies	Return	S&P, same days	vs S&P	Up
1	JFJohn Fetterman After selling +38.5 vs S&P, 1 sale	Dem	PA	6	5	+37.7%	+12.9%	+24.8	100%
2	SCShelley Moore Capito After selling +1.8 vs S&P, 58 sales	Rep	WV	18	11	+18.1%	+7.6%	+10.5	78%
3	KBKatie Boyd Britt After selling −7.4 vs S&P, 7 sales	Rep	AL	12	12	+7.7%	+2.6%	+5.1	75%
4	GPGary C. Petersthin After selling −11.7 vs S&P, 3 sales	Dem	MI	5	5	+4.8%	+1.8%	+3.0	80%
5	AKAngus S. King, Jr. After selling +11.0 vs S&P, 12 sales	Ind	ME	23	23	+5.2%	+4.2%	+1.0	52%
6	JBJohn Boozman After selling −1.1 vs S&P, 151 sales	Rep	AR	155	80	+5.8%	+5.4%	+0.4	64%
7	JHJohn W. Hickenlooper After selling +8.3 vs S&P, 12 sales	Dem	CO	7	6	−5.7%	+7.0%	−12.7	43%

Returns are per decision, equal weight, measured from the day the report became public. A record at the minimum (5 decisions, 3 companies) is marked thin.

Tap a column to sort by it. "Decisions" counts the separate calls that are old enough to have a three month number, and "Companies" how many different companies they cover. A senator joins this table on 5 decisions across 3 companies, so a run of buys in one share is not a record.

Every decision counts once and counts the same, because a Congress report gives ranges, not amounts. One company in one report is one decision, however many lines it was filed on. Measured from the close of the first trading day after the filing date, because a report can be posted a day after the date it carries and the hour is never given, so this is what a reader could have done, not what the member did.

Ranked by what the trades did beyond the S&P 500 over the same days, so a record that only rode a rising market does not sit at the top. The plain return is in the next column. Pick a window above the table: one month, three months or six months. Each window ranks the people whose decisions are old enough to have a number for it, so the one month board has more names than the six month board.

The small line under a name is that person's sales over the same window: what the stock did after each sale against the S&P, sign flipped, so a positive number means the stock fell behind the market after the sale. Sales never move the ranking.

Senators, by what their purchases did over six months

SC

Shelley Moore Capito

Rep · WV · 15 decisions

Return+31.6%S&P +11.9%

+19.7

points vs S&P

KB

Katie Boyd Britt

Rep · AL · 12 decisions

Return+11.5%S&P +5.4%

+6.1

points vs S&P

AK

Angus S. King, Jr.

Ind · ME · 23 decisions

Return+13.4%S&P +7.4%

+6.0

points vs S&P

All 5 · sorted by vs S&PSwipe to see all columns →

#	Senator	Party	State	Decisions	Companies	Return	S&P, same days	vs S&P	Up
1	SCShelley Moore Capito After selling +5.9 vs S&P, 54 sales	Rep	WV	15	9	+31.6%	+11.9%	+19.7	80%
2	KBKatie Boyd Britt After selling −9.4 vs S&P, 7 sales	Rep	AL	12	12	+11.5%	+5.4%	+6.1	75%
3	AKAngus S. King, Jr. After selling +10.9 vs S&P, 3 sales	Ind	ME	23	23	+13.4%	+7.4%	+6.0	70%
4	JBJohn Boozman After selling −6.3 vs S&P, 112 sales	Rep	AR	127	73	+11.7%	+10.4%	+1.3	80%
5	JHJohn W. Hickenlooper After selling +16.6 vs S&P, 10 sales	Dem	CO	7	6	−17.7%	+9.8%	−27.5	29%

Returns are per decision, equal weight, measured from the day the report became public. A record at the minimum (5 decisions, 3 companies) is marked thin.

Tap a column to sort by it. "Decisions" counts the separate calls that are old enough to have a six month number, and "Companies" how many different companies they cover. A senator joins this table on 5 decisions across 3 companies, so a run of buys in one share is not a record.

Every decision counts once and counts the same, because a Congress report gives ranges, not amounts. One company in one report is one decision, however many lines it was filed on. Measured from the close of the first trading day after the filing date, because a report can be posted a day after the date it carries and the hour is never given, so this is what a reader could have done, not what the member did.

Ranked by what the trades did beyond the S&P 500 over the same days, so a record that only rode a rising market does not sit at the top. The plain return is in the next column. Pick a window above the table: one month, three months or six months. Each window ranks the people whose decisions are old enough to have a number for it, so the one month board has more names than the six month board.

The small line under a name is that person's sales over the same window: what the stock did after each sale against the S&P, sign flipped, so a positive number means the stock fell behind the market after the sale. Sales never move the ranking.

Company insiders, by what their buys did over one month

Only open market buys count, measured from the close of the filing day when the filing landed before 20:00 UTC and the next day when it landed later. There is no company rule here: an insider files about one company by nature.

Company insiders, by what their buys did over three months

Only open market buys count, measured from the close of the filing day when the filing landed before 20:00 UTC and the next day when it landed later. There is no company rule here: an insider files about one company by nature.

Company insiders, by what their buys did over six months

Only open market buys count, measured from the close of the filing day when the filing landed before 20:00 UTC and the next day when it landed later. There is no company rule here: an insider files about one company by nature.